Hogan Lovells logo
  • Our people
  • What we do
    Sectors Practices Legal Tech
    • Aerospace and Defense
    • Automotive and Mobility
    • Consumer
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Financial Institutions
    • Insurance
    • Life Sciences and Health Care
    • Manufacturing and Industrials
    • Private Capital
    • Real Estate
    • Sports, Media and Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Transportation and Logistics
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Disputes
    • Intellectual Property
    • Regulatory
  • Case studies
  • Our thinking
    • All Our thinking
    • Comparative guides
    • Digital Client Solutions
    • Events and webinars
    • Podcasts
    News image_2

    Trump Administration Executive Order (EO) Tracker

  • ESG
  • Careers
Search Search
close
Search Search Search
lang-sel-icon English
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español
  • Français
  • 日本語
  • 中文
False
people-new
Mobile area
  • About us
    • Overview
    • Our history
    • Global management team
  • Where we are
  • Media center
    • Media contacts
    • Press releases
    • Awards & rankings
  • Responsible Business
  • HL Inclusion
  • Alumni
LinkedIn
Youtube
twitter
Wechat
News

2024 Securities, Shareholder, and M&A Litigation Outlook

10 April 2024
Image
Image
wechat x linkedin
hogan-lovells-logo
Share by email
Enter email
Enter Subject
Cancel
Send
News
2024 Securities, Shareholder, and M&A Litigation Outlook
Chapter
  • Chapter

  • Chapter 1

    Chapter 1

In the latest edition of our Securities, Shareholder, and M&A Litigation Outlook for 2024, we analyze key developments from 2023 and discuss how the most important cases from Delaware may impact companies now and in the year to come.

We have observed the following themes in 2023, which we expect to continue in 2024:

The importance of Section 220 in terms of books and record requests;

Guidance on the application of Corwin cleansing;

The boundaries of Caremark Appraisal actions; and

The importance of clear contractual language, both in standalone and foundational documents.

Below is an excerpt of the Outlook for 2024 from our publication, which also includes an executive summary and coverage of key decisions from 2023 in Delaware courts.

The outlook for 2024

2023 was a busy year, with both the Delaware courts and others, including the U.S. Supreme Court, weighing in on shareholder and M&A litigation issues. The Delaware Court of Chancery issued several notable decisions on issues critical to companies incorporated in Delaware, as well as those seeking to engage in transactions with Delaware-incorporated entities. Over the past year, our coverage has highlighted four trends.

  • The Delaware courts continued to address Section 220, issuing decisions that demonstrated the importance of responding to a stockholder and providing books and records if the stockholder has met the requirements, including identifying a proper purpose.
  • The Delaware courts provided additional guidance on the application of Corwin cleansing, finding cleansing appropriate if there are no allegations to support a reasonable inference that a vote was not fully informed, but inappropriate when stockholders were unaware of material conflicts or when a deal included long-lasting defensive measures.
  • The Delaware courts issued decisions that further developed the law surrounding Caremark claims, which have seen a resurgence since the 2019 Marchand v. Barnhill decision. Decisions in 2023 addressed the duty of oversight for officers, the appropriate showing needed to plead a Caremark claim, statutes of limitations, and tolling principles.
  • Many decisions in 2023 turned on a close reading of contractual language, both in standalone agreements, such as voting agreements, as well as in foundational documents, like partnership and LLC agreements. These decisions demonstrate the significant impact that contractual language can have on shareholder claims.

In addition, several courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, issued notable decisions that impact corporations and shareholders in Delaware and beyond, including opinions related to the interpretation of the phrase “such security” in the Securities Act of 1933 and the mechanisms available to enforce fee advancement orders. More detail on these trends and cases can be found below.

In 2024, we expect to see the Delaware courts continue to develop the law in these and other areas. At the end of 2023, several cases addressing transactions with controllers or conflicts of interest remained pending in Delaware. Decisions in these cases, which are expected this year, will provide insight into the courts’ views of who is a controlling shareholder, what constitutes a conflicted transaction, and when and how a special committee should be implemented. In 2024, we expect more Caremark claims to be filed, leading to more opinions that will further define the contours of the Caremark doctrine. 2024 also may see developments around ESG. Companies and shareholders alike continue to juggle “greenwashing,” “greenhushing,” new ESG disclosure rules, and the uptick in backlash litigation. While ESG litigation is brought on many theories nationwide, a Delaware court has one case pending that alleges a breach of fiduciary duty based on actions alleged to be beneficial for the company but a “net-negative” for society. Guidance from Delaware courts on ESG issues will be significant for Delaware-incorporated entities and beyond.

 

Click the image below to view the full outlook.

 

 

Authored by Allison M. Wuertz, Jon Talotta, William (Bill) M. Regan, David R. Michaeli, Christopher Pickens, Ann Kim, Jordan Teti, Maura Allen, Sean MacDonald,  Tyler Waywell, Shannon Zhang, Elizabeth Cochrane, Jason Chohonis, Christine Jiha, and William Winter.

Chapter 1

1

Chapter 1

expanded collapse

Preparation for the DORA regulation will also be a priority which will entail: (i) testing the readiness of critical market infrastructures, both trading and post and post-trade, to meet the upcoming requirements; (ii) recommendations and/or guidelines to the industry for compliance with DORA; and (iii) the implementation of a cybersecurity incident communication and management process.

Contacts

bio-image

Ann C. Kim

Partner

location Los Angeles

email Email me

bio-image

Allison M. Wuertz

Partner

location New York

email Email me

bio-image

David R. Michaeli

Partner

location New York

email Email me

bio-image

Jon M. Talotta

Partner

location Northern Virginia, Washington, D.C.

email Email me

bio-image

William (Bill) M. Regan

Partner

location New York

email Email me

bio-image

Christine Jiha

Associate

location New York

email Email me

View more

More on this topic

image1
News

Quarterly Corporate / M&A Decisions Update Series - Q2 2021

31 August 2021

View more

left_arrow
right_arrow

Related topics

  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Corporate and Securities Litigation
  • Risks, Disputes, and Litigation
  • Aerospace and Defense
Load more

Related countries

  • United States
Load more

Related keywords

  • Caremark
  • Delaware Court Decision
  • M&A Transactions
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Corporative governance litigation
  • Securities litigation
  • Section 22
  • Corwin
Load more

View more insights and analysis

arrow
arrow
"" ""
Digital Client Solutions
Empowering you to lead change through our digital solutions.
Learn more

Register now to receive personalized content and more!

 

Register
close
See benefits
Register
Hogan Lovells logo
Contact us
Quick Links
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Case studies
  • Contact us
  • HL Inclusion
  • Our people
  • Our thinking
  • Responsible Business
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Fraudulent and Scam Emails
  • Legal notices
  • Modern Slavery Statement
  • Our thinking terms of use
  • Privacy
  • RSS
Connect with us
LinkedIn
Youtube
Twitter
Wechat
Stay in the know

© 2025 Hogan Lovells. All rights reserved. "Hogan Lovells" or the “firm” refers to the international legal practice that comprises Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and their affiliated businesses, each of which is a separate legal entity. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Subscribe to Our thinking
Connect with us
LinkedIn
Youtube
Twitter
Wechat